Captain harish uppal vs union of india
Web1) The existence of a body of specialized knowledge or techniques 2) Formalized method of acquiring training and experience 3) The establishment of representative organization with professionalism as its goal. 4) The formation of ethical codes for the guidance of conduct.
Captain harish uppal vs union of india
Did you know?
WebCourt in Ex.Captain Harish Uppal v. Union of India and another [(2003) 2 Union of India and another [(2003) 2 Supreme Court Cases 45] and contended that insofar as the code of conduct in WebDec 17, 2002 · Writ Petition (civil) 132 of 1988 PETITIONER: Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal RESPONDENT: Union of India & Anr. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 17/12/2002 BENCH: CJI, …
http://rajdeepandjoyeeta.com/bail-applications-to-be-disposed-of-normally-within-one-week/ WebJul 20, 2024 · Harish Uppal vs Union of India on 17 December, 2002 The petitioner, in this case, was an ex-army officer. In 1972 petitioner was …
WebApr 12, 2024 · The Bench suggested that in view of judgment of this Court in Ex Captain Harish Uppal versus Union of India (2003) 2 SCC 45, such suspension of work or strikes are clearly illegal and it is high time that the legal fraternity realizes its duty to the society, which is the foremost. It was also held that, 'The condolence references can be once ... WebDec 17, 2002 · Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal V. Union Of India & Anr [2002] Insc 547 (17 December 2002) Court Judgment Information Year: 2002 Date: 17 December 2002 Court: Supreme Court of India INSC: [2002] INSC 547 Text of the Court Opinion CJI, DORAISWAMY RAJU, S. N. VARIAVA, D. M. DHARMADHIKARI (WITH W. P. (C) No. …
WebEx Capt. Harish Uppal Vs Union of India Case Whether Lawyers have Right to Strike Case 3,762 views May 12, 2024 77 Dislike Share Save The Constitution 52.9K …
The Supreme Court of India concluded that the strike by an advocate is considered unlawful and illicit. A strike might be allowed in the most extraordinary of the uncommon … See more The Constitution of India: 1. Article 226: Powers given to the court to issue writs. 2. Article 145: defines the rules of court. The Advocates Act: 1. Section 7: Functions of the Bar Council of … See more screwtape safest road to hellWebIn view of judgment of this Court in Ex. Captain Harish Uppal versus Union of India[18], such suspension of work or strikes are clearly illegal and it is high time that the legal fraternity realizes its duty to the society which is the foremost. Condolence references can be once in while periodically say once in two/three months and not frequently. screwtape summaryWebFeb 9, 2024 · The Supreme Court finally put this issue to rest in 2002, by delivering a landmark judgment in the case of Ex Capt. Harish Uppal v Union of India W.P (civil) … screwtapes most interesting letterWebIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Decided On: 17.12.2002 Appellants: Ex. Captain Harish Uppal Vs. Respondent: Union of India (UOI) and Anr. Strike by lawyers Hon'ble … paynefullyfitWebThis is a landmark judgment of the Supreme Court of India in which the question – “Whether the lawyers have a right to go on a strike?” was decided The parties to this case are : 1 Captain Harish Uppal- Petitioner 2 of India and another – Respondent Before coming to the facts of the case, let us understand the background of this case: screwtape offers a toastWebMar 31, 2024 · The Court also dealt with the issue of obstruction of Court proceedings by uncalled for strikes/abstaining of work by lawyers or frequent suspension of court work after condolence references. In Ex. Captain Harish Uppal v. Union of India [ (2003) 2 SCC 45], it was held that such suspension of work or strikes are clearly illegal. screwtape study guideWebMar 30, 1994 · (1) that the petitioner had approached the From the Judgment and Order dated 16-3-1984 of the Delhi High Court in C.W.P. No. 827 of 1984 196 Supreme … screw tapes